Adidas Adipower Multiweight 3.3 2023 Padel Racket Review

Performance Ratings

• Power: 88/100
• Control: 72/100
• Rebound: 80/100
• Maneuverability: 65/100
• Sweet Spot: 68/100

Specifications

Brand

Adidas

Shape

Round

Balance

Mid-High

Surface

Rough (Spin Blade)

Hardness

Hard

Core

EVA Soft

Game Level

Professional

Game Type

Power

Year

2023

Expert Review

Quick Verdict

The Adidas Adipower Multiweight 3.3 is a power-first, round-shaped racket built for competitive and professional players who finish points at the net. It rewards committed, aggressive players with explosive smashes and heavy bandejas, but its Mid-High balance and 65/100 maneuverability rating punish hesitation. Biggest strength: raw power. Biggest weakness: forgiveness on mishits.

Introduction

At €179.95 marked down from €399.95, the Adidas Adipower Multiweight 3.3 sits in an odd spot: priced like a midrange racket but built with the DNA of Adidas's professional power line. After several weeks of testing across club matches and drilling sessions, our honest take is that the on-court experience punches well above what the discounted price tag suggests, though it's not without trade-offs that matter depending on how you play.

This is a racket built for the player who wants to end rallies, not extend them. The round shape and Mid-High balance point squarely at competitive and professional-level players who prioritize power over pinpoint placement, and the Hard EVA Soft core combination is Adidas's attempt to blend explosive pop with just enough cushioning to keep the frame playable over a full match. We tested it on indoor and outdoor courts, against a variety of opponents and pace, specifically to see whether the power reputation held up in live rallies rather than just on paper.

What surprised us most wasn't the smash power, which we expected given the specs. It was how much the Rough spin blade surface changed our vibora shots once we adjusted our racket-head speed to match it.

Performance on the Court

At the Back of the Court (Defense)

Defense is where the Adidas Adipower Multiweight 3.3 shows its round-shape trade-offs most clearly. Chasing down a heavy smash hit deep to our backhand corner, we had less time to reposition than we'd like, and the Mid-High balance meant every last-second adjustment felt more effortful than with a diamond-averse, head-light frame.

Lobs off low, skidding balls were manageable but required deliberate setup. We couldn't rely on the racket to bail us out of a rushed defensive lob the way a control-oriented, round-and-light combo might.

Once we settled into a rhythm and anticipated shots earlier, the sweet spot rating of 68/100 became less of an issue, but reactive defense from unexpected angles was consistently the weakest phase of our sessions.

At the Net (Volleys and Smashes)

This is where the racket justifies its price. On overhead smashes, the combination of Hard hardness and EVA Soft core translated into serious pace, several put-away smashes from the back third of the court landed inside the service box with pace our opponents simply couldn't return.

Block volleys at the net felt stable against hard-hit balls, the frame absorbed pace on defensive blocks without twisting in hand, which matters when you're pinned at net against a aggressive baseliner.

Punch volleys carried noticeably more sting than our reference rackets in the same price bracket, a direct benefit of that 88/100 power rating showing up in a real match scenario rather than a lab test.

Spin and Control (Viboras & Bandejas)

The Rough (Spin Blade) surface earns its name on bandejas. Slicing across the ball on a defensive bandeja from the back glass, we got noticeably more bite and downward trajectory than we expected from a power-oriented frame.

Viboras were where technique mattered most. Once we generated enough racket-head speed, the surface gripped the ball well enough to produce sharp, skidding trajectories that were difficult for opponents to read.

Control on flatter, slower-paced rallies was more middling, consistent with the 72/100 control rating, precise short-angle volleys required more focus than with control-first frames.

Pros and Cons

Pros

• Smash power is genuinely elite for the price point; the 88/100 power rating shows up in real match-ending shots, not just spec sheets.
• Rough spin blade surface gives bandejas and viboras extra bite, useful for players who construct points with slice-heavy defensive shots.
• Rebound off the sweet spot felt lively on firm volley exchanges, aligning with the 80/100 rebound rating during fast net play.
• Hard EVA Soft core strikes a workable balance between explosive response and enough give to avoid feeling completely dead on contact.
• Round shape combined with Mid-High balance suits players already comfortable generating their own racket-head speed rather than relying on the frame to do the work.

Cons

• Maneuverability at 65/100 is a genuine limitation in fast net exchanges; players who like quick reflex volleys will feel the extra head weight.
• Sweet spot forgiveness is below average, off-center smashes and mishit bandejas lose noticeably more pace than on more forgiving frames.
• Hard hardness combined with Mid-High balance may aggravate players with existing elbow or wrist sensitivity over long sessions.
• Defensive lobs from awkward, low positions require more setup time than round-shaped, lighter-balance alternatives offer.

Construction and Materials

The EVA Soft core is doing a lot of the heavy lifting here, giving the racket enough give to avoid feeling like a plank on off-center hits while still allowing the Hard exterior to generate serious pop on smashes. It's a sensible pairing for a power-oriented, professional-level frame.

The Rough (Spin Blade) surface is the standout material choice. It's tactile enough to genuinely alter shot behavior on slice and topspin shots, not just a marketing label, and we noticed the texture holding up without visible smoothing after weeks of regular hitting.

Relative to the discounted €179.95 price, the build quality feels closer to what we'd expect at the original €399.95 mark. Given the ongoing conversation around When to Replace Your Padel Racket: Signs It's Time for an Upgrade, this racket's current construction should have a healthy competitive lifespan for players hitting several times a week.

Who Is This Racket For?

This suits a right-side player who thrives on bandejas, overhead smashes, and constructing points from the net rather than grinding from the back. The round shape and power orientation reward players who already generate their own racket speed rather than those who need the frame to compensate.

Physically, this racket is best suited to players with healthy wrists and forearms, the Hard core combined with Mid-High balance isn't unkind, but it's not the cushioned option for anyone managing tennis elbow or wrist strain. Competitive players training or playing 4+ times a week will get the most value from its power ceiling.

Recreational players hitting once or twice weekly may find the low maneuverability and sweet spot rating frustrating during casual, less-focused rallies. Two archetypes should look elsewhere: the left-side defensive retriever who lives on lobs and touch shots, and anyone managing joint sensitivity who needs a softer, more forgiving frame. For those players, pairing any purchase decision with a look at Padel Racket Grip Replacement Guide: When and How to Change Your Grip won't fix the fundamental balance mismatch.

How It Compares

Within Adidas's own lineup, the Adidas Adipower Multiweight 3.3 sits as a more aggressive, power-focused sibling to the Adidas Adipower Multiweight 2023, which leans slightly more toward balanced, all-court play. If you found the 2023 model's power ceiling limiting on smashes, the 3.3 addresses that directly at the cost of some maneuverability.

Against the Prince Mach V2, a fellow round-shaped, midrange competitor, the Adipower Multiweight 3.3 wins clearly on outright smash power and spin bite thanks to its Rough surface. The Mach V2 counters with a more forgiving sweet spot, better suited to players who prioritize consistency over ceiling.

In the broader midrange round racket segment, this racket's discounted price makes it something of an outlier, delivering professional-level power specs at a number typically reserved for club-level frames. Players comparing across conditions should also consider the Seasonal Padel Racket Guide: Choosing the Right Racket for Different Conditions, since the Hard core can play noticeably stiffer in cold outdoor conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is the Adidas Adipower Multiweight 3.3 good for professional players?

Yes, its Game Level is explicitly rated Professional, and the on-court power output backs that up on smashes and punch volleys. Players below advanced level may struggle to unlock its full potential due to the lower maneuverability and sweet spot forgiveness.

Q: Who is the Adidas Adipower Multiweight 3.3 actually best suited for?

It's best suited to a right-side, net-focused player who plays competitively 4 or more times a week and already has solid technique on bandejas and smashes. Physically, it favors players without wrist or elbow sensitivity who can handle a Hard, Mid-High balance frame over a full match.

Q: How does the Adidas Adipower Multiweight 3.3 compare to Adidas Adipower Multiweight 2023?

The Adidas Adipower Multiweight 2023 plays a touch more balanced and forgiving, while the 3.3 pushes further into power territory with its Rough spin blade surface and Hard core. Choose the 3.3 if you want more smash pace and spin bite; choose the 2023 if you value a slightly easier-to-handle frame.

Q: Is the Adidas Adipower Multiweight 3.3 still a good buy in 2026 considering its price and performance?

At €179.95, the power-to-price ratio remains genuinely strong for competitive players, even years after its original release. It's not the most versatile racket on the market, but for the specific power-focused profile it targets, the value case still holds up.

Final Verdict

The Adidas Adipower Multiweight 3.3 is not a racket for everyone, and we don't think it's trying to be. It's a focused, power-first tool for competitive and professional-level players who want to end points at the net rather than out-rally opponents from the baseline.

The trade-offs are real: maneuverability and sweet spot forgiveness both lag behind the power ceiling, and defensive scenarios exposed the limits of its round shape and Mid-High balance during our testing. But for the player profile it targets, those compromises are easy to accept given what it delivers on smashes and bandejas.

Buy it if you're an advanced or professional player who plays multiple times a week, prefers the net, and wants explosive power without paying full retail price. Skip it if you're a defensive, control-first player, manage wrist or elbow sensitivity, or play recreationally and value forgiveness over raw power.