Siux Pack Duo Siux Trilogy Ii Control Patty Pro 2023 Padel Racket Review

Performance Ratings

• Power: 68/100
• Control: 88/100
• Rebound: 74/100
• Maneuverability: 82/100
• Sweet Spot: 80/100

Specifications

Brand

Siux

Shape

Round

Balance

Mid

Surface

Rough (24K)

Hardness

Medium

Core

EVA Soft

Game Level

Advanced

Game Type

Control

Year

2023

Expert Review

Quick Verdict

The Siux Pack Duo Siux Trilogy II Control Patty Pro is a control-first, round-shaped racket built for advanced players who construct points rather than end them early. Its biggest strength is pinpoint accuracy on bandejas and volleys; its biggest weakness is limited pop on flat smashes for players craving raw power.

Introduction

There's a specific sound a round-shaped control racket makes on a clean bandeja — a muted, controlled thud rather than a sharp crack — and the Trilogy II Control Patty Pro produces exactly that. It's the kind of feedback that tells you immediately this frame was never designed to overpower opponents. It was designed to place the ball exactly where you want it, repeatedly, under pressure. Siux built this racket for the advanced player who values placement over brute force, and within the 2023 Siux lineup it occupies a clear niche: a round-shaped, Mid-balance frame with an EVA Soft core paired to a Rough 24K surface, aimed squarely at players who already have the technical foundation to exploit its control ceiling. We tested the Siux Pack Duo Siux Trilogy II Control Patty Pro across multiple sessions — baseline defense, net exchanges, and extended rallies — to see whether the on-paper control rating actually translates to match-day confidence. What surprised us most during testing wasn't the control itself, which we expected given the round profile, but how forgiving the sweet spot felt on mishits from the back court, an area where round shapes usually punish you.

Performance on the Court

At the Back of the Court (Defense)

Defending against heavy smashes with this racket felt notably calm. The Mid balance keeps the head from feeling front-loaded, so recovering into position after a stretch defensive lob doesn't cost you the split second you'd lose with a head-heavy frame.

On low balls dug out near the back glass, the round shape's generous sweet spot bailed us out more than once on off-center contact. It's not a racket that punishes imperfect technique the way a diamond shape would.

Chasing down lobs and redirecting them cross-court felt intuitive rather than forced, which matters for players who spend long stretches camped at the baseline.

At the Net (Volleys and Smashes)

Block volleys against hard-hit balls stayed remarkably stable — the racket absorbs pace rather than fighting it, which kept our returns low and controlled instead of popping up as easy attacking balls for the opponent. Punch volleys had enough bite to close out points at the net without needing an exaggerated swing.

Where the racket shows its ceiling is on flat smashes. The 68/100 power rating matched what we felt on court: smashes landed with accuracy but rarely with the kind of explosive pace that ends a point outright. Players relying on smash-heavy game plans will need to generate that power themselves through technique.

Spin and Control (Viboras & Bandejas)

The Rough 24K surface grips the ball noticeably well on slice-heavy shots. Viboras came off the strings with a clean, biting spin that made the ball skid low on the opponent's side rather than sitting up invitingly.

Bandejas were where this racket felt most at home — controlled trajectory, consistent depth, and enough texture on the surface to add just enough slice without overcooking it. If your game leans on constructing points from mid-court, this is a genuinely rewarding shot to hit with this frame.

Pros and Cons

Pros

• Round shape and generous sweet spot forgive off-center contact during fast defensive exchanges, reducing unforced errors from mishits.
• Mid balance keeps the racket agile in quick net exchanges, which lines up with the maneuverability rating we felt firsthand during rapid-fire volley duels.
• Rough 24K surface provides genuine bite on viboras and slice shots, giving shot-shapers more variety without sacrificing consistency.
• EVA Soft core is gentle on the arm during long sessions, an underrated benefit for players who train multiple times a week.
• Control-oriented design rewards precise cross-court volleys and bandejas, matching the strong control rating we observed in actual rallies.

Cons

• Limited power ceiling on flat smashes means aggressive finishers will feel like they're leaving points on the table.
• Players transitioning from stiffer diamond-shaped rackets may need an adjustment period to trust the softer feel on aggressive swings.
• The Medium hardness core, while arm-friendly, doesn't reward players looking for maximum rebound off defensive blocks near the back wall.
• Not an ideal fit for players whose entire game plan is built around ending rallies early with raw pace.

Construction and Materials

The EVA Soft core is the defining material choice here, and it shows up in every softer-paced exchange. It compresses gently on contact, giving that muted, controlled feel we noticed from the very first bandeja, rather than a sharp, high-rebound response.

Paired with the Rough 24K surface, the racket grips the ball convincingly on slice and topspin shots without feeling abrasive or inconsistent shot to shot. The texture held up well across our testing sessions without noticeable wear.

At €189.95 relative to its original €729.94 listing, the build quality feels considerably above its current price point. For an advanced-level, control-type racket, the materials punch well above what we'd expect at this price, though players should still consult our When to Replace Your Padel Racket: Signs It's Time for an Upgrade guide once the surface texture eventually softens with heavy use.

Who Is This Racket For?

This racket suits players on either side of the court, though we found it particularly rewarding for the right-side player who builds points through bandejas, viboras, and precise cross-court volleys rather than relying on a booming smash. It's an all-court frame at heart, not a specialist for one shot.

Physically, the EVA Soft core makes it comfortable for players managing mild wrist or elbow sensitivity, and the Mid balance suits moderate swing speeds rather than the fast, whip-like motion smash-first players prefer. It's well suited to competitive players training 3-4 times a week who need consistency over multiple long sessions.

This is not a racket for the player who loves to end points with flat smashes from the left side — the round shape and soft core simply won't generate the explosive pop needed. It is the racket for the player who constructs points patiently and trusts precision over power.

Players who play once a week recreationally may not fully exploit the control ceiling here; a more forgiving, power-oriented racket might serve them better in the short term.

How It Compares

Within Siux's own catalog, the Trilogy II Control Patty Pro sits firmly in the control-oriented, advanced-level tier rather than competing with the brand's power-focused diamond shapes. Against the broader midrange round racket market, it holds its own on precision but trails slightly on outright pace.

Compared to the Royal Padel Japan Pro, the Trilogy II feels noticeably softer underhand and more forgiving on mishits, while the Japan Pro tends to reward cleaner, more committed swings with sharper rebound off the back glass. Players who prioritize a plush feel over aggressive pop will lean toward the Siux.

Against the Dunlop 25 Galactica Pro Ls, the Galactica Pro LS leans harder into power delivery, making it the better pick for smash-dependent players, whereas the Trilogy II's superior control and sweet spot forgiveness make it the more consistent option for long, patient rallies. Neither competitor quite matches the Trilogy II's blend of surface grip and arm comfort at this price bracket.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is the Siux Pack Duo Siux Trilogy Ii Control Patty Pro good for advanced players?

Yes, it's explicitly built as an advanced-level, control-type racket. Advanced players who value shot placement over raw power will get the most out of its round shape and Rough 24K surface during technical rallies.

Q: Who is the Siux Pack Duo Siux Trilogy Ii Control Patty Pro actually best suited for?

It best suits an all-court or right-side player who relies on bandejas, viboras, and controlled volleys rather than flat power smashes. Physically it favors players with moderate swing speeds and those managing arm comfort, and it holds up well for competitive players training 3-4 times weekly.

Q: How does the Siux Pack Duo Siux Trilogy Ii Control Patty Pro compare to Royal Padel Japan Pro?

The Siux feels softer and more forgiving on off-center hits, while the Royal Padel Japan Pro rewards cleaner technique with sharper rebound. Players prioritizing comfort and control over aggressive pace will prefer the Trilogy II.

Q: Is the Siux Pack Duo Siux Trilogy Ii Control Patty Pro still a good buy in 2026 considering its price and performance?

At its current price of €189.95, it remains a strong value for an advanced control racket, especially given the noticeable gap from its original €729.94 listing. Just make sure to check Padel Racket Grip Replacement Guide: When and How to Change Your Grip before your first sessions, since a fresh grip meaningfully improves feel on a control-oriented frame like this one.

Final Verdict

The Siux Pack Duo Siux Trilogy II Control Patty Pro earns its place as a genuinely capable advanced-level, control-oriented racket rather than a marketing exercise. Its round shape, Mid balance, and EVA Soft core combine to deliver exactly what the spec sheet promises: precision over power, forgiveness over aggression.

We'd also point players toward our Seasonal Padel Racket Guide: Choosing the Right Racket for Different Conditions before committing, since the soft core's feel can shift slightly in colder conditions.

Buy it if you're an advanced player who wins points through patience, spin, and placement rather than brute force. Skip it if your entire game is built around explosive smashes and you're unwilling to compromise on power for control.